With the latest workplace shootings fresh in our minds,
employers may turn to the obvious question:
Have we done enough to prevent and promptly respond if it happens here? Employers must strike a balance between
generating hysteria and encouraging vigilance.
Here are some things employers can do:
Use effective hiring
practices to screen out potential violence:
Screen incoming employees for past incidents of aggressive
behavior. In screening processes, make
sure that you are asking questions about past incidents, but in a way that
targets the behavior, and not potential mental illness. Ask if the employee was ever disciplined for
fighting with co-workers or clients, if the employee ever violated workplace
safety rules, etc. Idaho statutes provide immunity from lawsuits for employers
who share information upon being asked. (PS Congress also is considering a
federal law providing a safe harbor for employers who report violent behavior.)
Also, consider conducting a criminal
background check. While you must be
careful to avoid discrimination charges (more on that in a future blog post) by
conducting a background check you will be aware of whether there are aggressive
or violent tendencies in the candidate that could lead to violent behavior in
the workplace. Screen out the behavior, not the cause.
Implement a workplace
behavior policy that addresses violence and bullying: Screening techniques are helpful, but anger
might build over time, which means that an existing employee could begin to
exhibit violent tendencies. To assist in
such situations, the employer should be proactive. Have a policy in place that
governs respectful workplace behavior, not just related to discrimination, but
which also addresses angry behavior, fighting, aggressive behavior, threats,
etc. Allow employees to report such
behavior by promising that they will be protected from retaliation. Have
multiple avenues for employees to report concerns. A bullying policy can address many of these
issues. Make sure to include behavior
that is verbal or physical. Address the
use of profane language, insults, humiliating another person, destruction of
property of another, name calling, ridicule, and can even include gossip and
spreading false rumors. Do not assume
that an employee is mentally ill, instead approach this issue from the
standpoint of regulating the inappropriate behavior. Then, when someone violates the policy,
impose consequences on everyone, not just one employee. Make sure your discipline is consistent.
Also train managers on proper action to take if the employee
indicates the aggressive behavior is due to a disability. In a 2015 case, a worker reported he was
having homicidal thoughts, and asked for treatment. No behavior had yet manifested in the
workplace. Instead of offering mental
health treatment, the employer waited three weeks, then terminated without clearly
identifying the reason other than the employee’s disclosure. The trial court allowed to case to go to
trial, indicating that the case would test the competing policies of
accommodating disability and protecting the workplace.
Train managers on
what to look for in spotting potential threats: Train supervisors on what to do when they
receive a complaint, or how to spot problem behavior before a complaint
arises. Bring in an expert in violence
prevention and train managers on what to look for in behavior that is
potentially violent. Have the expert
train managers in techniques to deal with anger in the workplace. Put protocols in place to assure the
manager’s safety in addressing the angry employee, such as using the buddy
system during confrontations, meeting with doors open, having a plan for a
quick exit, knowing when to call 911 for help, etc. Consider partnering with
local police agencies to review your workplace for safety and security. Also
consider bringing in a professional to consult on investigations into violent
behavior, to help assess the risk.
Workplace violence seems to be on the rise, and must be
addressed, but these three areas are good ways for employers to be proactive in
preventing and assessing risks.
No comments:
Post a Comment